The spores of hate spread quickly

The dynamics of the war begin to create the subtle gas that will fuel it for a long time.

The US government donated money to Ukraine to buy weapons. In doing so they turned the conflict against the CIA's Nazi creature in Europe into a US war against Russia on European soil. Cause and consequence. Aggression and retribution. The Americans throw gasoline on the fire and could end up provoking a nuclear war that will inevitably reach US territory.

The dead will see the end of the war, said Plato. World War IV will be fought with clubs and stones, Einstein said. Americans are desperately trying to regain global hegemony, but after the End of History, only radioactive scorpions will dominate the planet.

Germany's chancellor tried to convince Chinese diplomats to withdraw support for Russia. By acting as the US's "pet", Annalena Baerbock probably demonstrated all the fragility of a country that needs Russian gas and that, however, cannot get rid of the trauma of the American and British bombings that destroyed and set fire to German cities. from 1943 to 1945. This move by Germany's diplomacy will not be interpreted as friendly by the Kremlin.

And to make matters worse, Germany decided to supply weapons to Ukraine saying that they will be used to fight Putin and not Russia. The distinction emphasized by DW is ridiculous and irrelevant. Soldiers killed with German weapons will be Russians. Their relatives will obviously demand that Russia take revenge on the Germans. The spiral of violence tends to grow, as Germany is part of NATO.

The president of France will hold a meeting with his military cabinet. Macron seems willing to send troops to fight the Russians. His boldness will be interpreted by Russia as the resurgence of the 'Waffen Grenadier Brigade of the SS Charlemagne' - the infamous French troop that collaborated with the Third Reich - or, worse, the great Napoleonic army.

Every time the French went to war with Russia, things went wrong in France. But who really needs to study history? Francis Fukuyama is the hero of neoliberals everywhere.

Eternal return from the past with a re-enactment of the Battle of Lake Peipus (1242). This time NATO's Teutonic Knights seem to believe they will defeat the Russians, because Prince Alexander Nevsky is dozing in his grave. The Russians probably know this is not true and see victory as a historic inevitability.

The musty smell of European military history can be smelled in NATO's pretensions to expand to and beyond Russia's border. Even if that means provoking a nuclear war. Which brings us to the inevitable question? This can only be a joke, because there are no winners when everyone is equally condemned to annihilation.

And since we are talking about clowns, the behavior of the European press is regrettable. BBC, DW and RFI are committed to Ukraine's defense and strive to demonize the Russian effort to contain violence against civilians in Donetsk and Lugansk that has been silently tolerated by Europeans since 2014.

Supposedly exempt analysts point their fingers at Russia accusing it of violating Ukraine's territorial integrity. They are the same ones who applauded the fragmentation of Yugoslavia and demanded the bombing of Serbia in defense of Kosovo's right to become independent from that country.

Russia has been accused by the BBC of monitoring social media and reintroducing censorship. But in Brazil I was summoned by Twitter at the request of German authorities because I dared to criticize the journalism done by DW in defense of the bestial regime that the CIA created in the heart of Europe to torment Russia and guarantee the monopoly of gas sales to Germany.

"The first maxim of war is truth", this maxim attributed to Aeschylus remains true.

But the truth is that war is also capable of killing freedom of expression as irreconcilable opposing camps are created by the press. The Brazilian constitution and international law guarantee freedom of expression, but none of that counts when a foreign government can simply create a routine to prevent Brazilians from criticizing the work of German journalists.

If criticism equates to terrorism, what meanings can the words "democracy", "freedom", "rule of law" have, when they are used by journalists who desperately want to group people together to fight an alleged bestial Russian regime while they themselves stand by side of the Azov Battalion of the Ukrainian Nazis?

Selective forgetting is the bread and butter of journalists and religious swindlers, the political tool of bloodthirsty leaders, the curse of historians and the laughing stock of philosophers. However, the state of war created and constantly fed against Russia is extremely dangerous.

Right now we are all potential victims of a nuclear war. No one should have the right to silence anyone.

Before the end of history, an irony. The Clowndämmerung - downfall of Ukraine's ruling clown - should be viewed with relief by Emmanuel Macron, Boris Johnson, Olaf Scholz and Justin Trudeau. But that is not what is happening. They are mediocre leaders ruled by an undeclared racial hatred against Russians.

Fortunately I'm not a journalist. If so, would I be researching the stock price of US armaments factories right now to see if it has risen or fallen as a result of the war in Ukraine? This is important, as many gringos seem to believe that there is no real harm when someone profits from war. Well... the moment they are also bombed they will realize the harm they have done to themselves.